Section outline

    •  

      0 points

      1 point

      2 points

      3 points

      Risk-taking: Identification and Reflection

      Significant issues are missing; no reflection on the learning experience.

      Limited identification of key issues and reflection.

      Minor gaps in the key issues, Potential for more exploration of further meaningful reflection.

      Key entrepreneurship issues precisely articulated. Deep understanding of personal and group learning.

      Boundary crossing: Coordination and Transformation

      Flawed or no collaboration plans; insights are not actionable strategies.

      Some coordination but plans suffer from execution challenges; strategies lack innovation or adaptability.

      Potential for effective coordination across boundaries to transform ideas into actionable strategies for sustainable entrepreneurship.

      Diverse boundaries, coordinated and transformed; coordinated collaboration plans; learning applied to real-world scenarios with innovative thinking and adaptability.

      Feasibility

      Solutions lack practicality and feasibility; implementation challenges not addressed at all.

      Limited consideration of feasibility; significant implementation challenges unaddressed.

      Some aspects of feasibility considered, but significant implementation challenges remain unaddressed.

      Well-thought-out and feasible solutions proposed, considering potential obstacles and practical implementation.

      Market potential

      Limited understanding of the target market and its potential.

      Some understanding of the target market, but minimal exploration of market potential.

      Some understanding of the target market, but market potential not fully explored or articulated.

      Strong analysis of the target market (including size and characteristics) and market potential for the proposed solution.

      Triple Bottom Line

      People, planet and profit not considered.

      Limited attention to one or two of the three bottom lines.

      All three bottom lines addressed, but with incomplete or superficial analysis.

      All three bottom lines addressed with thorough and well-researched analysis.

      Addressing and solving the challenge

      Insufficient consideration of challenge-specific metrics; lack of relevance to the presented challenge.

      Minimal attention to challenge-specific metrics; limited relevance or depth.

      Some attention to challenge-specific metrics, but limited relevance or depth.

      Comprehensive and insightful analysis of challenge-specific metrics directly related to the presented solution to the sustainability challenge.

      Novelty

      Lack of originality:

      ideas presented are common or unremarkable.

      Limited originality:

      ideas lack creativity or uniqueness.

      Moderate level of originality:

      some creative ideas presented.

      Highly original:

      demonstrates a fresh perspective.